Welcome to
Web BBS
By Dr. Pita Enriquez HarrisNorthern Light has a new advertisement, which makes ample use of white space, stating simply, in the centre of an almost empty page: "You're a corporate librarian. Obviously, you're in it for the glory." It is meant ironically. (I'm guessing.) Would you believe it if I told you I think it's true? Think about it. On the one hand we've got management gurus like Peter Drucker telling us that because of the massive shift from manual work to knowledge work, information challenges and the productivity of the knowledge worker will be the key indicators of future economic success. On the other hand, we have those surveys from Reuters that warn of the dire consequences of an executive workforce suffering from information overload, not to mention regular articles in the broadsheets making the same point (only, more stridently). How we deal with issues of information overload and information literacy therefore, has become one of the chief challenges of economic growth. And information professionals, including corporate librarians, have an opportunity to lead the way. We tend to think of machines as being good at processing information. This is true for processes that can be expressed as a mathematical algorithm and which are repetitive. What machines aren't yet very good at is mimicking the human power of making the types of complex decisions like "Is this relevant" and "Why?" and "Who should know this, and why?" and "Who would know more about this?" and "What information is missing here?" Human brains are relatively amazing at processing information in this way. It'll be a very long time before a computer can write "The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire." But we can't parallel-process or multi-task the way computers can. And we get tired after a few hours and need to nap and watch "Star Trek" to get our minds off the information. Learning and processing information are, like any human function, grounded in physiological processes. If we knew exactly what these were, we might be able to manipulate them with drugs. There is already some indication that the nicotine in cigarettes can aid learning - you learn faster when you're taking a drag! But there would probably be a cost to manipulating the brain in this way - you might get tired faster, for example. If we want to get better quickly at handling information overload in the near future, we have only two realistic options. One is to get better at producing information. The second is to use software intelligently, without expecting that it alone will solve all the problems. You could argue that contrary to popular opinion, we are not, in fact, demonstrating the limits of our ability to process information. That 'information overload' is caused primarily by an abundance of unusable, irrelevant information. We can plan to tackle this problem by investing millions to develop software that can filter out the trash. We could also tackle the problem at the other end, improving the quality of the information we produce so that there isn't so much trash, and teaching people from an early age how to do information research efficiently. Noreen Mac Morrow of Strathclyde Business School, agrees that information overload is as much a cultural as technological issue. "We gather more and more information but allow ourselves less and less time to actually absorb it. Part of the problem is finding that reflective time to be able to put the pieces together in a way that is meaningful." Dr. Michael Stein, a Commissioning Editor with Blackwell Science tells me; "The problem with information overload is that people are unable to make a coherent story out of it. They try to bring in all this disparate information but what really makes a good story, or a good textbook, is a distillation of wisdom. All our best teachers have the story-telling skill." If the transfer of the written word from the page to the screen is relatively non-revolutionary, the invention of hypertext is. It introduces a whole new perspective to the story-telling paradigm of human communication - the story that is bifurcating, labyrinthine, and always unique. Dr. Stein reflects on the implications of this. "The problem with the Internet is all the amazing amounts of information. Certain people have the ability to navigate through that and create their own story. But most people aren't actually that creative. They want to be told, they want to hear stories." Now, even Big Business seems to be embracing this idea. In his paper to the 1999 Knowledge Management Conference and Exhibition (held in London, March 1999), David Snowden of IBM Global Services spoke about a new KM practice of collecting and storing the kind of anecdotes about the business and using this database of stories to the advantage of the company. If adopted generally as a 'KM Technique', this will represent a realistic, duplicable approach to the problem of how to capitalize on the tacit knowledge within an organization. As Thomas Stewart writes in an article for Fortune, "Nothing serves a leader better than a knack for narrative. Stories anoint role models, impart values, and show how to execute indescribably complex tasks." Free Pint is using this technique also. William Hann has facilitated the creation of a virtual community, with storytellers at the heart of the movement. The Free Pint writers weave stories around a handful of carefully chosen Web addresses, picked for their ability to add value to the experience of going onto the Web. Without the story, we'd be left with fragmentary information, and little evidence of the human mind behind the plan. Finally, here's some ammunition to use to persuade your managers to take information overload seriously and plan for training and software solutions. Surveys on information overload: http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Subway/7854/abs.htm The Implementation of Intranet Technology as a Solution to Information Overload in the Top 100 Commercial Organisations in the United Kingdom by Steve Parker of Queen Mary University College, Edinburgh. http://www.reuters.com/rbb/research/overloadframe.htm http://www.reuters.com/rbb/research/newresframe.htm "Dying for information" and "Out of the Abyss" - the Reuters-commissioned survey which sparked the furore and the follow-up which shows that although there are improvements, we still have a way to go. Also useful is the Reuters Guide to Good Information Strategy at http://www.reuters.com/rbb/research/gisframe.htm Why search engines aren't good enough: http://www.anchordesk.com/a/adt0708ba/3594 "Search Stinks! But you don't have to take it" Jesse Berst's comments on the latest research findings (published in Nature) of search engines and how well (or not) they cover the Web. Learn about upcoming software tools that use visualization to help make sense of huge volumes of information: The Information Refinery (http://tir.tasc.com/) I2 (http://www.i2.co.uk) Harlequin (http://www.harlequin.co.uk) > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Pita Enriquez Harris is one of the founders of The Oxford Knowledge Company, which is dedicated to helping companies tackle information overload. They offer training, software and custom research and current awareness services to assist people to make the best use of external information. A more comprehensive version of this article will be published in ASLIB's Millenium book; "i in the sky: Visions of the Information Future" edited by Alison Scammell. Publication date is December, orders via Portland Press, Tel 01206 796 351, email sales@portlandpress.co.uk. Other articles by Dr. Harris can be found on the company Web site at: http://www.oxford-knowledge.co.uk/ You can also download a trial copy of award-winning Web search software BullsEye from http://www.oxford-knowledge.co.uk/bullseye.htm Email: pita@oxford-knowledge.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - This interview is reprinted from http://www.freepint.co.uk/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
If you have any queries about this page, please contact: Chris Smith
|